Cross Baking Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Chief Judge.
The employer’s basic defense to this section 8(a) (5) and (1) refusal to bar*1348gain ease is that the union certification was improper. It assigns two reasons.
1. Fear and Coercion. On November 18, 1968 an incident occurred on a public street in which one Patricia Von Dre-den, as the principal actor, and another, assaulted two others, all being employees of the company, because they refused to pledge support to the union. The injuries received by one of the victims kept her from returning- to work for two months. Word of this, naturally, got about the plant, and there was talk…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Homer Nelson BarcleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Home Town Foods, Inc. D/B/A Foremost Dairies of the South v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Pepperell Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Olson Rug Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Harlan 4 Coal Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Beaird-Poulan Division, Emerson Electric Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Henderson Trumbull Supply Corporation v. The National Labor Relations Board, Region 2Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Zeiglers Refuse Collectors, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. L & J Equipment Co., Inc., United Mine Workers of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.