Legal Opinion

State v. Cocke

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2002No. CC C9604-33280; CA A96903; SC S46978PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

The issue in this criminal case is whether the police lawfully conducted a warrantless search of a private apartment in a large house. The search was intended to ensure the safety of police officers who were processing evidence seized in connection with the arrest of a tenant of one of the other apartments in the house. The trial court ruled that the warrantless search was a valid “protective sweep” of the house and, therefore, that evidence obtained as a result of that search was admissible against defendant, who was the tenant of the separate apartment. A divided Court of Appeals affirmed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. GuggenmosOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. RudderOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. ZumbrumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. KreisOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. MaddenOregon Supreme Court · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API