Legal Opinion

State v. Zumbrum

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 23, 2008No. 200508125; A131228PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Following a stipulated facts trial, defendant was convicted of unlawful possession of a controlled substance. Former ORS 475.992 (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840 (2005). On appeal, he assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress a methamphetamine pipe that was seized following a warrantless search. We reverse and remand.

In reviewing a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress, we are bound by the trial court’s factual findings if there is evidence in the record to support them. State v. Hendricks, 213 Or App 360, 362, 160 P3d 1014, rev den, 343 Or 467 (2007). When…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. MiglavsOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. State v. RickardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. BertschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. BarberMarion County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. RegnierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. KingsmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API