Vrabel v. SCHOLLER

Opinion by

Me. Justice Jones,

When a phase of this litigation was here before (see Yrabel v. Scholler, 369 Pa. 235), Mr. Justice Bell, speaking for this court expressly stated that “Three important questions are involved: (1) Was the mutual mistake of fact which defendant [garnishee] alleged sufficient in law to void the insurance policy which it issued before and cancelled after the insured’s accident; (2) Was it a condition precedent that the financial responsibility certificate prepared by garnishee be accepted by the Revenue Department before this insurance policy could go into effect; and…