Legal Opinion

Miller v. the Home Ins. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1932No. Appeal 4PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parkeb, J.,

•The appellant states the question involved in this case as follows: “Does double insurance exist where two insurance policies cover the same premises and the same assured, one policy indemnifying against loss by windstorm and the second policy indemnifying against loss by fire and windstorm?”

The plaintiff having instituted an action in assumpsit and filed a statement of claim, the defendant replied with an affidavit of defense raising the question of law indicated in the foregoing statement of the question involved; and the parties then stipulated that if the court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sloat v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
  2. Meigs v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Clarke v. Western Assurance Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1892
  4. Swoope v. United States Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Yanko v. Standard Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Vrabel v. SCHOLLERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Vrabel v. SCHOLLERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Eiffert v. Pennsylvania Central Brewing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Home InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Agricultural InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API