American Casualty Co. of Reading v. Phico Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAPPY, Justice.
This direct appeal involves the question of allocation of liability payments between two excess liability insurers. More precisely, we must determine the appropriate common law rule for apportioning the loss between insurers where the policies at issue contain irreconcilable and mutually repugnant “other insurance” clauses. For the reasons that follow, we determine that apportioning liability payments by equal shares is the appropriate allocation method and therefore reverse the Commonwealth Court.
This appeal arises out of a declaratory judgment action filed…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Vrabel v. SCHOLLERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- CC Housing Corp. v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SamuelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Nationwide Insurance v. Horace Mann InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Amhs Insurance Company, Risk Retention Group, a Foreign Corporation v. Mutual Insurance Company of Arizona, an Arizona Corporation, Amhs Insurance Company, Risk Retention Group, a Foreign Corporation v. Mutual Insurance Company of Opinion Arizona, an Arizona CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Progressive Northern Insurance v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Allstate Insurance v. Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.