Graham v. New York, Department of Civil Service
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge:
Defendant State of New York has moved pursuant to rule 3(j) of the Local Civil Rules for reargument of this Court’s Opinion and Order dated February 17,1987, 653 F.Supp. 1363, familiarity with which is presumed. After carefully considering the papers submitted by the parties, I conclude that there is no reason to change my original decision. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is denied.
Defendant claims that the Court was in error in holding that the Supreme Court decision of City of Los Angeles v. Manhart, 435 U.S. 702, 98 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Arizona Governing Committee for Tax Deferred Annuity & Deferred Compensation Plans v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Spirt v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Graham v. State of NY, Dept. of Civil ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ventura v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Independent Union of Flight Attendants v. Pan American World Airways, Inc. And Pan American CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Graham v. New York, Department of Civil ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Graham v. State Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988