City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. Manhart
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
As a class, women live longer than men. For this reason, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power required its female employees to make larger contributions to its pension fund than its male employees. We granted certiorari to decide whether this practice discriminated against individual female employees because of their sex in violation of § 703 (a)(1) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended.1
For many years the Department2 has administered retire*705ment, disability, and death-benefit programs for its employees. Upon retirement each employee is eligible for a monthly retirement benefit…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by721 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
716 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.