Independent Union of Flight Attendants v. Pan American World Airways, Inc. And Pan American Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. 664 F.Supp. 166 (S.D.N.Y.1987).
We add one brief comment. Subsequent to the decision of the district court, the appellant, the Independent Union of Flight Attendants (“IUFA”), petitioned the National Mediation Board for an election to determine whether it might represent Pan Am Express’s flight attendants. The Mediation Board determined that such an election should be held. IUFA received a majority of votes in that election, and now represents those flight attendants. We believe that these events underscore the correctness…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Graham v. New York, Department of Civil ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
3Cited by9 opinions
- Association of Flight Attendants, Afl-Cio v. United Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Wheeling Acquisition Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1990
- Flight Engineers' International Association, Paa Chapter, Afl-Cio v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., and Pan American CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- American Train Dispatchers Ass'n v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Ford v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n InternationalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.