Legal Opinion
Gershman v. Gershman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 8, 2008No. SC 17924PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal 1 is whether the trial court properly concluded that the defendant had dissipated marital assets where there was no evidence that the defendant had engaged in financial misconduct for a nonmaritai purpose. We conclude that the trial court improperly determined that the defendant had dissipated marital assets, and, accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court reasonably found the following facts. The plaintiff, Debra S. Gershman, and the defendant, Donald Gershman, were married in 1987. Three children were…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Almgren v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Krafick v. KrafickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- In Re Marriage of Fennelly & BreckenfelderSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Crews v. CrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Kaczynski v. KaczynskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Finan v. FinanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Powell-Ferri v. FerriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.