Legal Opinion
Katz v. Rosen
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 10, 1975No. Civ. 35300PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIAN, J.
David Katz appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his complaint for libel against John Rosen.
The declarations supporting and opposing the motion for summary judgment are not in factual conflict. Curtis Freund, an attorney, was retained by Madalyn Honig early in 1970 to represent her in a personal injury action. Freund hired Dr. John Rosen, the respondent herein, to perform a medical examination of Miss Honig and to write a report regarding the extent of her injuries. Respondent performed these services and charged $56 and $100 for the examination and report,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ramstead v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Younger v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Ascherman v. NatansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Locke v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Smith v. HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Taus v. LoftusCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Imig v. FerrarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Hecimovich v. Encinal School Parent Teacher OrganizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Tiedemann v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Hackethal v. WeissbeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.