Legal Opinion

Hackethal v. Weissbein

California Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1979No. L.A. 31016PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEWMAN, J.

— Plaintiff has appealed from judgments of dismissal in three consolidated actions after the trial court sustained demurrers, without leave to amend, on the ground that allegedly defamatory publications were immunized by these words of Civil Code section 47: “A privileged publication ... is one made . . . [i]n any (1) legislative or (2) judicial proceeding, or (3).in-any other official proceeding authorized by law . . . -”1 The parties agree that the privilege — if those words create it — would be' absolute, not qualified.

*58The issue here is whether a hearing before the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Westlake Community Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of OrthodontistsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of OrthodontistsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Ascherman v. NatansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Imig v. FerrarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hassan v. Mercy American River HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Kibler v. Northern Inyo County Local Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Moore v. ConliffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. ELSENBERG v. Alameda Newspapers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Zoneraich v. Overlook Hosp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API