Imig v. Ferrar
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHBY, J.
Plaintiff Imig filed a complaint against various defendants alleging assault and battery, and slander. A cause of action for malicious prosecution was added in a first amended complaint. This appeal involves only defendant Ferrar, who was named in the third and fourth causes of action (slander and malicious prosecution).. As to these counts, the trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer to the first amended complaint without leave to amend. Plaintiff appeals from the order of dismissal subsequently entered. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 581, subd. 3, 581d.)
According to the allegations…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Youngman v. Nevada Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Hardy v. VialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Pettitt v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Washer v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSBCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Forro Precision, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.