Legal Opinion

AINSLIE CORPORATION v. Middendorf

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 10, 1974No. Civ. A. 74-3035-CPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

CAFFREY, Chief Judge.

This is a civil action for declaratory and equitable relief. Plaintiff Ainslie Corporation (Ainslie) is a corporation organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Defendants are J. William Middendorf, Acting Secretary of the Navy; Commander D. Linehan, Commander of Procurement, Naval Regional Procurement Office, Long Beach, California; and Craig Systems Corporation (Craig), a corporation organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

The matter came before the court upon plaintiff’s application for a temporary…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. John H. Shaffer, Administrator (Acting) of the Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. Paul v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Keco Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  4. Heyer Products Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  5. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. B.K. Instrument, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. Sardella Construction Co. v. Braintree Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  3. Clark Const. Co., Inc. v. PenaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
  4. B.K. Instrument, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. Collins & Co., General Contractors, Inc. v. ClaytorDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API