Legal Opinion

Benson Mining & Smelting Co. v. Alta Mining & Smelting Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 16, 1892No. 347PublishedCited by 92 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE_ SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. The court stated the case as follows:. Oh July 25,1884, appellee, plaintiff- below, commenced its potion in the District Court of the First Judicial District of the' Territory of Arizona to recover of defendant the sum of $25,000 for 210 tons of silver-bearing ore, mined and removed from the Alta mine, situated in the Harshaw mining district, in Pima County, Arizona.

Read the full summary

APPEAL PROM THE_ SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. The court stated the case as follows:. Oh July 25,1884, appellee, plaintiff- below, commenced its potion in the District Court of the First Judicial District of the' Territory of Arizona to recover of defendant the sum of $25,000 for 210 tons of silver-bearing ore, mined and removed from the Alta mine, situated in the Harshaw mining district, in Pima County, Arizona. A jury having, been ^waived, the case was tried before the court, and a judgment was entered for the'plaintiff, on March 22, 1886, for the sum of $4590.06, with interest…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brewer

■ The amount due, as determined by the judgment of the Supreme Court of the Territory, was over $5000, being the sum of $4590.06, as awarded by the judgment of the District Court, with interest from its date, March 22, 1886, at ten per cent per annum, to February 17, 1888, the date of the judgment of affirmance. This court, 'therefore, has jurisdiction of the appeal. Zeckendorf v. Johnson, 123 U. S. 617.

On-the merits of the case two questions are presented. It appears that in 1879, Fagan, Harshaw and others were the owners of the Alta mine, and at that time made application to the proper land…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wooden-Ware Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Stark v. StarrsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  3. Deffeback v. HawkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Witherspoon v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Carroll v. SaffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1845

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. United States v. Ray Shumway Molly ShumwayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Guffey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Robert v. Ferry v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, Autrice Copeland Freeman v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. Payne v. Central Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API