Legal Opinion
Buaiz v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 24, 2007No. Civil Action 06-1312 (RMC)PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLYER, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant the United States of America’s motion to dismiss the Amended Verified Complaint. 1 Defendant contends that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the Complaint, which is based on alleged violations of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), Title 26 of the United States Code, and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 702, because the United States has not waived its sovereign immunity with respect to such claims. Plaintiff Joseph A. Buaiz, Jr., proceeding pro se, opposes the motion. For the reasons…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Morrow v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Pollinger v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Jaeger v. United States GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Spahr v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Wesselman v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.