Legal Opinion

Wesselman v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 17, 2007No. Civil Action 07-00906 (ESH)PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HUVELLE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Herman Alphonse Wessel-man has filed a pro se complaint raising forty-one boilerplate “counts” that “defendant, through principals, officers, agents, and/or employees of [the] Internal Revenue Service” (“IRS”) has “disregarded]” the Internal Revenue Code. (E.g., Compl. at 4.) For each count, plaintiff seeks “damages in accordance with [26 U.S.C. § ] 7433.” 1 (Id. at 18.) The government has filed a motion to dismiss and, for the reasons set forth herein, the motion will be granted.

BACKGROUND

The forty-one counts in plaintiffs complaint can be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Andrews v. HeatonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. Lonsdale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. Lewis v. GreenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jaeger v. United States GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  2. Kim v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  3. Bryant v. United States GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. Stewart v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. Hines v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API