Wesselman v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Herman Alphonse Wessel-man has filed a pro se complaint raising forty-one boilerplate “counts” that “defendant, through principals, officers, agents, and/or employees of [the] Internal Revenue Service” (“IRS”) has “disregarded]” the Internal Revenue Code. (E.g., Compl. at 4.) For each count, plaintiff seeks “damages in accordance with [26 U.S.C. § ] 7433.” 1 (Id. at 18.) The government has filed a motion to dismiss and, for the reasons set forth herein, the motion will be granted.
BACKGROUND
The forty-one counts in plaintiffs complaint can be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Andrews v. HeatonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Lonsdale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Lewis v. GreenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jaeger v. United States GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Kim v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Bryant v. United States GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Stewart v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Hines v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.