Legal Opinion

Spahr v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 17, 2007No. Civil Action 07-00362(ESH)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HUVELLE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Marshall R. Spahr has filed a pro se amended complaint raising twenty-six boilerplate “counts” that “de fendant, through principals, officers, agents, and/or employees of [the] Internal Revenue Service” (“IRS”) has “disregarded]” the Internal Revenue Code. (E.g., Am. Compl. at 4.) For each count, plaintiff seeks “damages in accordance with [26 U.S.C. § ]7433.” 1 (Id. at 14.) The government has moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  4. Kaempe, Staffan v. Myers, GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  5. Andrews v. HeatonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Morrow v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. Pollinger v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  3. Jaeger v. United States GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. Kim v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Kim v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API