Spahr v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Marshall R. Spahr has filed a pro se amended complaint raising twenty-six boilerplate “counts” that “de fendant, through principals, officers, agents, and/or employees of [the] Internal Revenue Service” (“IRS”) has “disregarded]” the Internal Revenue Code. (E.g., Am. Compl. at 4.) For each count, plaintiff seeks “damages in accordance with [26 U.S.C. § ]7433.” 1 (Id. at 14.) The government has moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Kaempe, Staffan v. Myers, GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Andrews v. HeatonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Morrow v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Pollinger v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Jaeger v. United States GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Kim v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Kim v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.