Legal Opinion
Sneed v. McDonnell Douglas
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 26, 1999No. 91,259PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.
¶ 1 Resolution of today’s appeal centers on whether a claimant’s failure to schedule (on a Form 3) or otherwise give notice to his employer of a known bodily injury - the product of cumulative trauma - within two years of last exposure to a harm-dealing micro-traumatic event results in the claim being time barred. 1
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Sneed [claimant] was employed by McDonnell Douglas [respondent or employer] for approximately eighteen years debarring metal. His work required the repetitive use of his hands, wrists and arms. He was last exposed to injury-causing micro-trauma on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Munsingwear, Inc. v. TullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Owings v. Pool Well ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- McDonald v. Time-DC, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Lacy v. Schlumberger Well ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- BE & K. CONST. v. AbbottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Ibarra v. Hitch FarmsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Thompson v. Anchor Glass Container Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Key Energy Services, Inc. v. MinyardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- American Airlines v. HickmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.