Legal Opinion
American Airlines v. Hickman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 3, 2007No. 101,472PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, C.J.
4 1 The question presented on certiorari is whether the Court of Civil Appeals erred when it ruled the statute of limitations, 85 O.S.2001, § 43, was not tolled by acts of the employer, American Airlines, thereby reversing the order of the three-judge panel of the Workers Compensation Court. We answer that the actions of the employer tolled the statute of limitations.
T2 The claimant, David B. Hickman, worked as a cabin crew member whose responsibilities included removal of the interior of the cabin on aireraft for inspections. On September 10, 2001, when he helped lift a heavy galley floor…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Oklahoma Furniture Mfg. Co. v. NolenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Nantz v. NantzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Sneed v. McDonnell DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- White v. HENG LY LIMSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- ARVINMERITOR, INC. v. ReddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Choate v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- LEWIS v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITYCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
- Gentry v. Berry Machine & Tool Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.