Legal Opinion

Crowder v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 2008No. 28798PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Judge.

Appellant (“Movant”) was convicted of first-degree assault and armed criminal action, and sentenced to consecutive 30 and 20-year prison terms. On direct appeal, this court affirmed under Rule 30.25(b). State v. Crowder, No. SD24603 (Mo.App. November 26, 2002).

Movant filed a Rule 29.15 motion asserting five claims for post-conviction relief. 1 The motion court deemed only one such claim (“Claim A”) cognizable under Rule 29.15 and denied relief after an evidentiary hearing thereon.

Movant raises two points on appeal. Our review is limited to whether the motion court’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. Tisius v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  4. State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. State v. NealMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. John Marshall v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API