Legal Opinion

Joos v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 2009No. SD 29139PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Presiding Judge.

Robert Joos (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his motion for Rule 29.15 1 post-conviction relief. His underlying conviction for driving without a valid license was affirmed on direct appeal in State v. Joos, 218 S.W.3d 543 (Mo.App.2007), 2 from which we borrow the facts without further attribution.

Background and Principles of Review

On November 14, 2004, Highway Patrol Corporal Brad Bearden (“Trooper Bear-den”) was driving through Powell, Missouri, when he saw an unidentified male, whom he later determined to be Movant, sitting in a truck near a closed store. As…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. SmullsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Phillips v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goodwater v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Noland v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. BRIAN SHAWN JONES, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Derry Beck II v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Gabriel Knight Dawson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API