State v. Haines

Dwyer, A.C.J.

¶1 James Haines was convicted of felony harassment, misdemeanor harassment, and misdemeanor stalking after he threatened Kebrah Bezabih on *430two separate occasions. He now appeals, contending that insufficient evidence supports his stalking conviction. According to Haines, this is so because the stalking statute requires proof of at least six predicate acts of harassment. Alternately, he contends that the statute is unconstitutionally vague. Finally, he contends that his combined convictions violate the constitutional guaranty against double jeopardy. Holding that proof of two…