Legal Opinion

State v. Bradford

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 12, 2013No. 68568-6-IPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, J.

¶1 A jury found Jonathan Bradford guilty of several offenses, including the felony stalking of Vanida Vilayphone. Pursuant to RCW 9A.46.110, a person is guilty of stalking if, inter alia, he or she “repeatedly harasses” another person. The stalking statute’s delineation of the term “harasses” incorporates the phrase “course of conduct” as set forth in RCW 10.14.020(1). The plain language of the definition of this term explicitly excludes from its scope constitutionally protected free speech activities. Accord*916ingly, contrary to Bradford’s contention, the stalking statute’s harassment provision…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re the Detention of H.N.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. State of Washington v. Daniel BlizzardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. State v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. State Of Washington v. Thanh Pham NguyenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API