Johnnie Coleman v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Beckwith, Associate Judge:
Soon after appellant Johnnie Coleman asserted his right to a jury trial, the government filed an amended information reducing the charge against him from stalking 1 to attempted stalking. 2 The case was transferred to a misdemeanor calendar, and Mr. Coleman was convicted of attempted stalking after a bench trial. On appeal, Mr. Coleman argues that he was denied his right to a jury trial and that his conviction was not supported by constitutionally sufficient evidence.
One of the elements of stalking is that the defendant "purposefully engage in a course of conduct"…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Graham v. T.T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- In re RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- Keerikkattil v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
- Mashaud v. BooneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
- Medhin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.