United States ex rel. Hudson v. Peerless Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CRAVEN, Circuit Judge.
These are appeals by Peerless Insurance Company from default judgments1 entered against Peerless in the district court. Complaints were filed in the name of the United States for the use and benefit of Bartenstein and Associates and R. F. Hudson against Giuliani Contracting Company, Inc. and Peerless to recover for work and labor performed by Bartenstein and Hudson in pursuance of Giuliani’s government contract. Peerless was joined as a party-defendant in each case because it was surety on the payment bond furnished by Giuliani as required by the Miller Act.2 Giuliani,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Frow v. De La VegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- United States of America, for the Use and Benefit Of, Statham Instruments, Inc. v. Western Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Kaufman & Ruderman, Inc. v. Cohn & RosenbergerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Western Contracting Corp. v. National Surety Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States of America, for the Use of R. F. Hudson v. Peerless Insurance Company, United States of America, for the Use of R. M. Bartenstein, John H. Bartenstein, and Michael H. Kelly, T/a R. M. Bartenstein & Associates v. Peerless Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Equipment Finance Group, Incorporated v. Traverse Computer Brokers, and Synchronized Design and Development Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Vick v. WongDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- Jefferson v. Briner, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- United States Ex Rel. Owens v. Olympic Marine Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.