Legal Opinion

Kaufman & Ruderman, Inc. v. Cohn & Rosenberger

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 15, 1949No. 56, Docket 21422PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

We need not decide whether or not the district court has jurisdiction of the declaratory judgment action. For even if it has, the court must determine whether, as a matter of judicial discretion, the suit ought to be entertained in a federal court. Assuming, then, that the court here has jurisdiction, we think it would have abused that discretion had it not dismissed the second cause of action.

Plaintiff (by asserting that the district court has jurisdiction of the declaratory judgment action) concedes that it could have had the state-court suit removed to the federal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Clark v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Ariola v. NigroIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Braund, Inc. v. WhiteAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Coy E. Kirtland v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Columbia Gulf Transmission CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API