Legal Opinion

United States of America, for the Use and Benefit Of, Statham Instruments, Inc. v. Western Casualty & Surety Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 12, 1966No. 16435PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judge.

This is an action brought pursuant to the Miller Act by the Plaintiff-Appellee, Statham Instruments, Inc., against Defendant-Appellant, Western Casualty & Surety Company. The case was submitted to the trial court upon motions for summary judgment filed by both parties. The trial court sustained the Plaintiff-Appellee’s motion, overruled the Defendant-Appellant’s motion, and gave judgment for the Plaintiff-Appellee. From this judgment the Defendant-Appellant appeals. The parties will be hereinafter referred to as Plaintiff and Defendant.

The pertinent and material…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BoomerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  2. United States v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  3. United States Ex Rel. Way Panama, S. A. v. Uhlhorn InternationalDistrict Court, Canal Zone · 1965
  4. United States ex rel. Pittsburg Planing Mill Co. v. ScheurmanDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1914
  5. United States v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Sharon Hageman, Admx. Of the Estate of Donald Hageman v. Signal L. P. Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  2. Marlowe v. Fisher BodyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  3. Richard Allgeier, Maria D. Boldrick, Intervening v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Asher v. Unarco Material Handling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Craig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API