Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RR. v. O'Malley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 1994No. WD 49497PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANNA, Judge.

In the underlying ease, plaintiff Charles Herriman seeks to recover damages from relator Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company. Plaintiff Herriman’s petition for damages was brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. (FELA), alleging that the relator “by and through its agents and employees” was negligent. Plaintiff’s interrogatories sought and obtained the names of three individuals who were identified as relator’s supervisors and employees who were working or present at the scene of the incident. Relator filed a motion seeking an order of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. In Matter of ConnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  4. Harper v. Missouri Pacific RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. State Ex Rel. Lichtor v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shane Weibrecht v. Southern Illinois Transfer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  2. State ex rel. Jackson County Prosecuting Attorney v. ProkesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State Ex Rel. White v. GrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Smith v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. US Ex Rel. O'Keefe v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API