Legal Opinion

In Matter of Conner

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 12, 1948No. 39956PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConkling, J.

[493] This disbarment proceeding comes to the writer upon reassignment. The respondent, Harold D. Conner, a licensed and practicing attorney, after preliminary investigation, and on April 2, 1946, was informed against in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. Filed under our Rule 5, the information of the 8th Judicial Circuit Bar Committee charged respondent with professional misconduct in that, he failed to pay over certain sums held by him as administrator and due the distributees of an estate upon a final settlement, contended that said sums were wrongfully converted to Conner’s own…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Clark v. AustinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. In Re Proceedings Against Richards for DisbarmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. In re KeenanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Grievance Committee of the Hartford County Bar v. BroderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. People ex rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. MeyerovitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. In re LiceagaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  2. Collins v. GodfreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. Scott v. RoperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  4. State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  5. In Re RandolphSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API