Legal Opinion
Templeton v. Pope and Talbot, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 5, 1971PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
The parties agree that the sole issue presented in this workmen’s compensation appeal is whether the claimant timely filed a claim for compensation for occupational disease. The relevant statutes are OBS 656.802(1) (a) which defines an occupational disease as:
“Any disease or infection which arises out of and in the scope of the employment, and to which an employe is not ordinarily subjected or exposed other than during a period of regular actual employment therein.”,
and OBS 656.807(1) which provides:
“* * * [A] 11 occupational disease claims shall be void unless a claim is filed * * * within…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Williams v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by8 opinions
- Guiley v. HammakerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- McKee v. Crescent Spinning Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Robinson v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Frey v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Wayne-Dalton Corp. v. MulfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.