Robinson v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.
Claimant appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that reversed the referee’s decision that her claim was timely filed and compensable. The Board found that the claim was not timely filed and therefore did not consider the merits of her claim. We reverse on the timeliness issue and remand to the Board for consideration of compensability.
Claimant began work as a salesperson for Struther’s Furniture in March, 1975. In the spring of 1978, she began to experience chronic fatigue. She continued working for Struther’s until she was laid off in November, 1978. In early 1979, she…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Satterfield v. STATE COMPENSATION DEPARTMENTCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- Gronquist v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Templeton v. Pope and Talbot, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- Compensation of McNett v. Roy-Ladd Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robinson v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Hayes-Godt v. Scott Wetzel ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Liberty Northwest Insurance v. MeekerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Farmers Insurance Group v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985