Legal Opinion

Wayne-Dalton Corp. v. Mulford

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 5, 2003No. 01-01311, 01-04099; A118838PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Employer challenges a ruling by the Workers’ Compensation Board that claimant was not time barred from pursuing his claim and that his claim is therefore compensable. In this case, we review under ORS 183.482 for errors of law. We conclude that the board’s ruling was based on the wrong legal standard and therefore reverse and remand to allow the board to reconsider its ruling based on the appropriate legal standard.

Claimant began working for employer in 1992. Since that time, he has worked as a welder, welding tracks for residential and commercial garage doors. Claimant asserts that his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Templeton v. Pope and Talbot, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  3. Liberty Northwest Insurance v. MeekerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Albany v. CaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Yellow Transportation, Inc. v. StaleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API