Legal Opinion

McKee v. Crescent Spinning Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1981No. 8110IC159PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

Our review of an award by the Industrial Commission is limited to two questions: (1) whether the Commission’s findings are supported by competent record evidence; and (2) whether those findings justify the Commission’s conclusions of law. Inscoe v. DeRose Industries, 292 N.C. 210, 232 S.E. 2d 449 (1977); Walston v. Burlington Industries, 49 N.C. App. 301, 271 S.E. 2d 516 (1980). In their first two assignments of error defendants argue that the Commission erred in its finding that plaintiff’s byssinosis was the cause of his pulmonary disease because of evidence that chronic…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Fetner v. Rocky Mount Marble & Granite WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Taylor v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Inscoe v. DeRose Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Walston v. Burlington IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lawson v. Cone Mills Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Lumpkins v. MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. May v. Shuford Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. McCall v. Cone Mills Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Dawkins v. MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API