Legal Opinion

Hall v. Kimmer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1886PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Calhoun. (Hooker, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in head-note 1.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

The action in this case is assumpsit, brought before a justice of the peace.

The plaintiff’s declaration was verbal, upon all the common counts; and added thereto was a special count on a contract for services of the plaintiff in obtaining pension money to which the defendant was entitled from the general government, whereby the plaintiff, under the arrangement, was to have not less than a quarter, and not more than one-half, of the amount received in case of success, and nothing in the case of failure.

Defendant’s plea was the general issue, and notice of set-off, and he further gave notice…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smart v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1882

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Benton & Brother v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Smith v. GladneyTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. In re the Arbitration between Gale & HiltsNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  5. In re Sánchez FerreriSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API