Smart v. White
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On exceptions and motion to set aside the verdict. Assumpsit for money had and received from the pension money of the plaintiff. The opinion states the case and the material facts. cited : 7 Green. 134: 10 Allen, 76 ; 11 Cush. 57 ; 11 Mass. 376 ; 61 Maine, 376 ; 4 Mass. 491; Taylor v. Jaques, 106 Mass. 291; ü. S. R. S., § § 4445, 5484, 5485, 4785 ; 2 Pars.
Read the full summary
On exceptions and motion to set aside the verdict. Assumpsit for money had and received from the pension money of the plaintiff. The opinion states the case and the material facts. cited : 7 Green. 134: 10 Allen, 76 ; 11 Cush. 57 ; 11 Mass. 376 ; 61 Maine, 376 ; 4 Mass. 491; Taylor v. Jaques, 106 Mass. 291; ü. S. R. S., § § 4445, 5484, 5485, 4785 ; 2 Pars. Contr. 254, (4th ed.) ; Concord v. Delaney, 58 Maine, 316; Worcester v. Eaton, 11 Mass. 376; Bliss v. Thompson, 4 Mass. 491; White v. Franklin Bank, 22 Pick. 181; Jones v. Barkley, 2 Dough 684; Dicey on Parties, 277 ; Elliott v. Swartwout,…
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Section 5485, U. S. R. S., provides thus : "Any agent or attorney, or any other person instrumental in prosecuting any claim for pension or bounty land, who shall directly or indirectly contract for, dem'and, or receive or retain any greater compensation for his services or instrumentality in prosecuting a claim for pension or bounty land, than is provided in the title pertaining to pensions, or who shall wrongfully withhold from a pensioner or claimant the whole or any part of the pension or claim allowed and due such pensioner or claimant, or the land warrant issued to any such claimant,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Walan v. KerbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Cameron v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Commonwealth v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. ErnstSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
- Mann v. BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Hall v. KimmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Michener v. WattsIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Badger Coal & Coke Co. v. Sterling Midland Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.