Smith v. Gladney
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Judge GERMAN
delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.
The only question in this case is whether or not an award of arbitrators based upon a gambling transaction can be enforced in a proceeding in court. Plaintiff in error, Bert K. Smith, and defendant in error, S. W. Gladney, had certain dealings involving trading in futures upon the Chicago Board of Trade. Such transactions were undoubtedly in violation of public policy. In these dealings Smith became indebted to Gladney, — so the latter claimed. A dispute arose, and the matter was submitted to the Arbitration…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- De Leon v. Manuel Trevino & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1878
- Benton & Brother v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Tandy v. Elmore-Cooper Live Stock Commission Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Polk v. Cleveland Ry. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1925
- Hall v. KimmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- CVN Group, Inc. v. DelgadoTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Rapid Settlements, Ltd. v. Symetra Life Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2007
- Flower World of America, Inc. v. WenzelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Houston Chemical Plant v. SanfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.