Farmer v. Premo
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, C. J.
In this post-conviction relief case, the state1 appeals from a judgment granting petitioner relief on a number of his claims, and remanding the case for a new trial. The state assigns error to the post-conviction court’s rulings on those claims, arguing that petitioner failed to establish, as a matter of law, that he was entitled to relief on any of them. We conclude that the post-conviction court did err in its legal analysis of each of the claims on which it granted relief, and we accordingly reverse the portion of the judgment granting post-conviction relief and remanding for a new trial.
In…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Farmer v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- Monica v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Johnson v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- O'Hara v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018