Legal Opinion

Farmer v. Premo

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 23, 2017No. 07C16834; A152447PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, C. J.

In this post-conviction relief case, the state1 appeals from a judgment granting petitioner relief on a number of his claims, and remanding the case for a new trial. The state assigns error to the post-conviction court’s rulings on those claims, arguing that petitioner failed to establish, as a matter of law, that he was entitled to relief on any of them. We conclude that the post-conviction court did err in its legal analysis of each of the claims on which it granted relief, and we accordingly reverse the portion of the judgment granting post-conviction relief and remanding for a new trial.

In…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farmer v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Monica v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Johnson v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. O'Hara v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API