Legal Opinion

Wah Chang v. PacifiCorp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 11, 2007No. 002578; A123961PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant appeals the trial court’s order granting plaintiff relief from judgment. ORCP 71 B(1). Originally, plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment declaring that it has no further obligations to purchase electricity from defendant under the parties’ contract. Plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that the primary purpose of that contract had been frustrated by an unanticipated event. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and, nearly a year after the entry of judgment, plaintiff sought relief under ORCP 71 B. Specifically, plaintiff proffered “newly discovered evidence”…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Lloyd v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Brewer v. ErwinOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. McCathern v. Toyota Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hemlock Semiconductor Operations, LLC v. SolarWorld Industries Sachsen GmbHCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. Kyocera Corp. v. Hemlock Semiconductor, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. D. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. TyonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API