Eidemiller v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.— Hon. John C. Stallcup, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dunbar,, J.
Appellant brought this action to compel the city treasurer of the city of. Tacoma to pay a ■certain warrant for the sum of $303.67. Said warrant was made and delivered by the city of Tacoma on September 29, 1893; was presented for payment on September 30,. 1893; and the treasurer of said city then and there indorsed upon said warrant, “Not paid for want of funds.” It is conceded in .this case that there are sufficient funds in the treasury to pay the warrant in controversy if it is legal to pay it out of the revenues raised by the city for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- San Francisco Gas Co. v. BrickwedelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. GelbachWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Clay County v. McAleerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Cloud v. Town of SumasWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Shaw v. StatlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ruano v. SpellmanWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Pine Tree Lumber Co. v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Skinner v. HoltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Anderson v. Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Bardsley v. SternbergWashington Supreme Court · 1897
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.