Legal Opinion

Bardsley v. Sternberg

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1897No. 2622PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. J. A. Williamson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, C. J.

This was an application by the appellant to the superior court of Pierce county, for a writ of mandate against the city treasurer, to compel him to pay the amount of five city warrants held by the appellant. The decision below was in favor of the treasurer. In passing upon the questions presented by the appeal we will first devote some attention to the point as to whether the appellant sought an appropriate remedy.

Two of the warrants were originally issued to George H. Boardman and R. A. Gove, respectively, for salaries for certain months…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mayor v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Meeker v. GardellaWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hill v. MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Chemung Canal Bank v. Supervisors of Chemung CountyNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  5. Eidemiller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Knight v. HirbourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Bardsley v. SternbergWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Adams County v. Ritzville State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Barker v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State ex rel. Olympia National Bank v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API