Legal Opinion

Ruano v. Spellman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1973No. 42388PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

This case arises from appellant’s suit to enjoin the King County Executive from further expenditure of funds on the King County stadium project until there has been a vote upon a proposed initiative. That initiative would terminate the stadium project.

Intervenor-Hawkins is a holder of five King County general obligation bonds earlier issued in connection with the stadium project. Intervenor-Wilson is a King County taxpayer. Both seek to prevent the initiative from going on the ballot.

In denying relief to the appellant and enjoining submission of the initiative, the trial court relied upon…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Planters' Bank v. SharpSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  4. Murray v. CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Ross v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Washington Federation of State Employees v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API