Shaw v. Statler
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
Application for writ of mandamus to (Compel the payment by the treasurer of San Diego (County of two warrants which had been duly issued. The court below granted the writ as to the first warrant '(No. 54), and denied it as to the second (No. 602). The petitioner has not appealed from the judgment denying ithe writ as to the second warrant, and therefore the questions argued as to it do not arise upon the record: The case comes up on the appeal by the defendant from the judgment granting the writ as to the first warrant. ■ This warrant recites that it was issued ppon a claim allowed…
2Cited by17 opinions
- McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Lewis v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Arthur v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Weaver v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Eidemiller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1896
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.