Legal Opinion

Robinson v. United States

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 20, 2001No. Civ. S-00-1628FCDPANPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAMRELL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Rodney Robinson, Linda Robinson, and Daniel Timko (collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs”) brought an action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 through 2680 against Defendant United States of America (“the Government”). Plaintiffs allege that agents and employees of the Government negligently allowed a prescribed fire started on the Government’s property to escape onto the property occupied by the Plaintiffs, thereby causing Plaintiffs to suffer emotional distress and damages to their personal property. This…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. ThitchenerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Clark v. Estate of Rice Ex Rel. RiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  3. Kimes v. GrosserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. United States v. Cb & I Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Edmonds v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API