Kimes v. Grosser
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARCHIANO, P. J.
A defendant neighbor allegedly shot plaintiff’s pet cat.- To save the cat’s life, plaintiff incurred substantial bills. The trial court dismissed the case on the grounds that plaintiff would be unable to prove the value of the cat exceeded the costs of “repair.” In this appeal, we are called upon to determine what damages can be awarded for a wrongful injury to a pet animal with little market value under these circumstances. We hold that the owner can recover the costs of care of the pet attributable to the injury if the costs are found to be reasonable and necessary,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Showalter v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Willard v. Valley Gas & Fuel Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Pfingsten v. WestenhaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Howard v. Thrifty Drug & Discount StoresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Plotnik v. MeihausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Martinez v. RobledoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Berry v. FrazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Berry v. FrazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- PCB Productions v. MJC America CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.