Legal Opinion
Edmonds v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 30, 2008No. Civil Action 05-540 (RMC)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sibel Edmonds brought this suit against her former employer, the United States (the “Government”), alleging intentional conversion under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (the “FTCA”). 1 The Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) employed Ms. Ed-monds as a civilian linguist. She accused another employee of misconduct, and she complained of alleged security breaches. The FBI subsequently terminated Ms. Ed-monds’s employment. Ms. Edmonds alleges that when she was fired she was not permitted to retrieve her…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Mieske v. Bartell Drug Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- Campins v. CapelsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Jaffe, Rochelle v. Pallotta TeamworksCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Nelson v. Insignia/ESG, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia v. VossoughiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Johnson v. McCoolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Dixon v. Midland Mortgage Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Dixon v. Midland Mortgage Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- E.M. v. Shady Grove Reproductive Science Center P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.