Snyder v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAERLE, J.
I. Introduction
Carl Clinton Snyder (Carl) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (USF&G) and J.P. Simpson (Simpson), its agent (respondents). His complaint sought to hold respondents liable on a guardianship surety bond taken out by Carl’s parents and guardians for losses suffered when his father stole funds from the guardianship account. Carl claims that a release he signed in favor of USF&G upon obtaining his majority is ineffective and that USF&G and Simpson breached duties they owed him. We reverse as to USF&G and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brantley v. PisaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Maloney v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Milo Equipment Corp. v. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Lewin v. AnselmoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Biggins v. RaischCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Horn v. Cushman & Wakefield Western, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Spitzer v. the Good Guys, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Estuary Owners Ass'n v. Shell Oil Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- The Estuary Owners Assn. v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 2017