Legal Opinion
Milo Equipment Corp. v. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 15, 1988No. E004283PublishedCited by 11 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Introduction
DABNEY, J.
Milo Equipment Corporation (Milo) appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (Water District) and Cornish Construction Company (Cornish). The operative facts are undisputed. The Water District contracted with Cornish for the construction of a public work of improvement on the Water District’s property. Cornish filed a payment bond as required by Civil Code sections 3247-3252, on which the sureties were Fairmont Insurance Company (Fairmont) and Employers Reinsurance Corporation. Cornish subcontracted with Cities…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re ShullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Larsen v. JohannesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Powers Regulator Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Hollywood Wholesale Electric Co. v. John Baskin, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Traders Etc. Ins. Co. v. Pac. Emp. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sea World, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Oldcastle Precast, Inc. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Royster Construction Co. v. Urban West CommunitiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Evans v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Grade-Way Construction Co. v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.