Legal Opinion
Spitzer v. the Good Guys, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 1, 2000No. A086999PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
Susan Spitzer appeals from the grant of summary judgment for respondent The Good Guys, Inc., her employer, in her suit alleging disability discrimination and retaliation under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). (Gov. Code, § 12940 et seq.) The trial court entered judgment for respondent on the basis of findings that it “reasonably accommodated” appellant’s disability and that no triable issue of material fact existed with respect to that issue or the elements of malice, oppression or fraud, which were essential to appellant’s claim for punitive damages.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Cheryl A. Gile v. United Airlines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Eric Crawford v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Robert D. Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., Karen Pierce Harvey ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Michael A. Mengine v. Marvin Runyon, Post Master General, U.S. Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Department of Fair Employment & Housing v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Nadaf-Rahrov v. the Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- King v. United Parcel Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Nealy v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Wilson v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.