Horn v. Cushman & Wakefield Western, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
Introduction
Appellant. Stanford Horn appeals from a judgment of the San Francisco Superior Court dismissing his action for age discrimination and breach of employment contract against respondent Cushman & Wakefield Western, Inc. (hereafter C&W) following the court’s grant of C&W’s motion for summary judgment. Horn contends the court erred in granting summary judgment. He argues: (1) the trial court erred in weighing the evidence; (2) Horn produced sufficient evidence which would have allowed a jury to infer the reasons given by C&W for his discharge were pretextual; and (3)…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Gary E. Wallis, Husband Carol Wallis, Wife v. J.R. Simplot CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
- Morgan v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Horsford v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Conte v. Wyeth, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.